Tue, 23 March 2010
This new guide provides researchers with an understanding of how peer review works and highlights some of the issues surround the current debates about the peer review process. The growth in the size of the research community and of the volumes of research being undertaken in the UK and across the world means that the amount of time and effort put into the peer review system is growing too, and that it is coming under increasing scrutiny. The guide looks at how effective peer review is in selecting the best research proposals, as well as in detecting misconduct and malpractice. It also looks at how fair the system is, and at the different levels of transparency involved in the process: from completely closed systems, where the identities of reviewers and those whose work is being reviewed are kept hidden from each other, and reports are not revealed, to completely transparent systems where identities and reports are openly revealed. The burdens on researchers as submitters and reviewers are by far the biggest costs in the peer review system, and the guide outlines some of the measures that are being taken to reduce those burdens, or at least to keep them in check. The internet has provided new channels through which researchers can communicate their findings, and through which other researchers can comment on, annotate and evaluate them. These new opportunities bring new challenges as well. The take-up of the opportunities for open comments, ratings and recommender systems has been patchy to date; and we currently lack clear protocols for the review of findings circulated in multiple formats, including blogs and wikis. The mechanisms for peer review will undoubtedly change in coming years, but the principle will remain central to all those involved in the research community. Go to bottom of page for download link.
Category:News
-- posted at: 4:49 PM
|
Thu, 11 March 2010
Concentrating research funding and doctoral students in just a handful of universities will damage both the UK university sector and the economy as a whole, according to new research from university think-tank million+ Launched on 2nd March 2010 at the House of Commons, ‘A Postgraduate Strategy for Britain’ argues that proposals from research intensive universities to concentrate postgraduate provision should be set aside; this approach would have a negative effect on the economy, will damage innovation, will undermine expansion and accessibility, and will weaken the international competitiveness of the sector. Recommendations from the report include: • The policy of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills which requires funding councils to support greater levels of concentration in high-level STEM from 2010-11 should be set aside. • Research councils should adopt positive policies to promote professionally focused and employer focused postgraduate provision. • A fairer share of postgraduate funding should be used to support innovation in postgraduate provision in new subject areas and emerging markets. • Part-time, flexible and accessible postgraduate provision should be incentivised by research and funding councils. • Targets should be set to increase the number and diversity of UK-domiciled postgraduate students. The research, undertaken in partnership with Coventry University, showed that modern universities deliver 37% of all postgraduate provision in the UK and support 76% of all postgraduate students considered as mature (25 or over). Modern universities also supported almost half (48%) of the total part-time postgraduate student population and attracted 40.6% of all new UK-domiciled minority ethnic students from 2007-2009. Professor Les Ebdon, Chair of million+ and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Bedfordshire said, “There is no economic or academic case for the concentration of funding for research or doctoral students. Once the lower levels of research funding received by modern universities are taken into account pound for pound these universities are more productive in their delivery of postgraduate provision which has always been reliant on the quality of teaching and supervision rather than on intensity or critical mass of research funding.” million+ also recommends that further detailed research is needed to look at student funding support models for postgraduate students. The complexity of the student support system for postgraduate students is a barrier for many individuals and needs to be simplified to increase access to and expand postgraduate provision. Lord Browne’s review of fees and funding in England should not seek to transfer funding from undergraduate provision to postgraduate provision. To download a copy of the report, please click here.
Category:News
-- posted at: 1:23 PM
|
Thu, 11 March 2010
It is time doctorates were seen as a qualification for all kinds of jobs in the modern world and not just as a ticket for an academic career, says the League of European Research Universities.
A new league paper, 'Doctoral degrees beyond 2010: Training talented researchers for society' says the doctorate has evolved into a qualification for people who are "highly creative, critical, autonomous, intellectual risk-takers who push the boundaries of knowledge and innovation whatever their employment destination may be". A growing number of doctoral graduates now go into non-academic careers says Professor David Bogle, main author of the LERU paper and head of the graduate school at University College London. Professor Bogle said, "This indicates there is a strong demand from the private and public sector for the skills that a doctorate instils for employment beyond the education sector." Such training should be concentrated in research-intensive environments where excellence is fostered, says the paper. It says that PhD graduates stand out by their competence, by their achievement and by their social skills. Under this last heading, the paper explains that such graduates "develop a team work attitude and can collaborate and communicate with specialists and non-specialists". It was the combination of these three skill sets that equipped doctoral graduates "to successfully apply their advanced skills in or beyond research and to take up leading roles in any employment where deep, rigorous analysis and creative thinking are needed." The development and take-up of these skills by society required a strong vision, forward looking investment and concerted effort by governments, employers, universities and by talented bright minds to make it happen. The league called on governments and the EU to increase investment in doctoral education, and on employers and universities to work together so that "rigorous research remains the cornerstone of the doctorate and that doctoral training is a suitable preparation for work in today's world". Among other recommendations to universities, it called for research to remain the cornerstone of the doctorate, and to develop doctoral graduates who were creative risk takers with a rigorous approach to the research questions they tackled. To download a copy of the report, please click here.
Category:News
-- posted at: 1:20 PM
|
Thu, 18 February 2010
A new report from CIHE outlines the findings of a small-scale study co-sponsored by RCUK which explored how the value of recruiting graduates and postgraduates is measured by employers
The report "The Value of Graduates and Postgraduates" from the Council of Industry and Higher Education confirms that there is a need within UK industry for graduates and postgraduates equipped with more business experience and commercial knowledge and understanding. It suggests that all graduates should be given more information about the skills and experience required by different sectors of industry, and in particular, they should be provided with up to date and relevant advice on specific employers’ requirements. The pilot study gathered information and identified key issues by looking at research literature and interviewing a small number of businesses across a range of industry sectors. Interviews focused on how different businesses assess the added value that recruits with undergraduate and masters degrees as well as those with doctorates bring to their company. In particular, questions were asked about how businesses manage the talent of their employees; how recruitment and promotion criteria are related; what additional value a post-graduate brings; and from which backgrounds do the best graduate and post-graduate recruits come from. The report states that employers would benefit from knowing more about the changing nature of postgraduate supply and be supported to understand how graduates with different qualifications could add value to their business. The study aligns with RCUK aims to broaden and deepen current understanding of the value and impact of doctoral training and it is expected that this report will help inform future activities in this area. To download a copy of the report, please click here.
Category:News
-- posted at: 2:15 PM
|

